Sirens heard early Tuesday morning Jan. 10th were responding to a fire on the MORMON TEMPLE property
In a story posted on the Westwood-Century City Patch, Sara Fay reports that a fire broke out at around 1 am on the grounds of the Mormon Temple. It was reported out at 1:27 am and was limited to a building under construction. There were no injuries and no additional buildings were involved. The affected building is approximately 4000 feet.
An arson investigation is underway.
Westwood-Century City Patch reader Erin Smith posted the following UTUBE video of the fire from her Westwood apartment:
Constituents report problems with Preferential Parking Permits! IF YOUR PERMIT'S EXPIRATION DATE HAS FADED, REQUEST A REPLACEMENT PERMIT. IF YOU RECEIVE A CITATION, APPEAL IT.
Preferential Parking Permits
We have been made aware that some citations have been issued for those with
valid preferential parking permits because the expiration dates on the parking
permits are not visible. It seems that LADOT has not used permanent ink
on some of the permits and they are fading over time. LADOT General Manager Jaime de la Vega
has issued a memorandum stating that any resident who has a valid permit
but receives a citation because the permit is faded should appeal the citation
to have the citation dismissed. Additionally, if the permit is valid, the faded
permit will be replaced at no charge. The memo also states that, while
LADOT researches the issue of fading, they will continue to issue
citations.
Please let us know if you are on the receiving end of such a citation as
the council office is keeping track of this problem.
City Council PLUM Committee directs the drafting of new modifications to proposed Sign Ordinance. Hearing of Dec. 5th sets the tone for serious consideration of commercial signage in parks, in the LA Zoo and at City facilities!
Although the majority of speakers attending the Dec. 5th hearing spoke against allowing commercial advertising in our City's parks, in the LA Zoo and at libraries and other City facilities, the members of the PLUM Committee seemed to embrace the notion that signage should be allowed because of the tough economic situation the City finds itself in. Councilmember Krikorian noted that there are proposals to privatize the zoo, and to close the zoo; somehow allowing advertising there will be the solution to the Zoo's (and the City's???) fiscal woes?
PLUM Chairman Reyes and Committee members Huizar and Krikorian instructed staff and the City Attorney's office to draft new language that would further dilute the intent of the City's 2002 Sign Ordinance and ban on new billboard signage. They seemed to believe that sign approvals in parks, for example, could be left to
Another round of revisions was just released in advance of the Dec. 5th PLUM meeting. In it there have been a number of improvements to the ordinance. However, there are some very glaring loopholes that remain... and some that have been recently created! We know that the outdoor advertising industry has considerable clout downtown and has invested a great deal of money on lobbying the City Council and Mayor this year in order to create a more favorable sign ordinance.
As reported on the www.banbillboardblight.org website this week, we are needing to counter this formidable presence of the billboard companies:
Most of the city’s billboards are owned by Clear Channel, CBS Outdoor,
and Lamar Advertising, which together with two smaller companies spent
$595,000 lobbying city officials in the first three quarters of 2011,
according to reports filed with the City Ethics Commission. The biggest
spender by far was Clear Channel, with a reported $338,000 in lobbying
expenditures.
What is it that the billboard companies seek? They wish to undermine the intent of the 2002 Sign Ordinance which declared that there could be no new off-site signs... no more new billboards! With the proposed creation of SIGN DISTRICTS and COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM it is critical that any new signs be offset by the REMOVAL of existing signs. Without that requirement, we face an explosion in the number of signs across the City. The industry wishes instead to create Community Betterment Funds whereby they can place money (how much and for what uses and who gets to use them????) and then avoid having to do any takedown of signs. The whole intent of the 2002 Sign Ordinance was to REDUCE signage and allow for the gradual reduction in signs across the city. Not so with the proposed changes to the ordinance. We recognize that there will always be special places where signage will grow unregulated... such as at downtown's LA LIVE and in Hollywood. However, to allow for the addition of signs in SIGN DISTRICTS across the City where they would be allowed (and there are now 14 proposed sign districts, a HUGE INCREASE from the two that had been proposed for approval when the City's Planning Commission held hearings and made recommendations on the proposed revisions to the Sign Ordinance.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus and it appears that he has the list from Clear Channel, CBS Outdoor and their buddies.
Rather than re-state all the issues here, please go to the recent summary posted on the Coalition to Ban Billboard Blight website: www.banbillboardblight.org
We will soon be emailing out a list of important points to make to those on our email blast list for your letters to the PLUM Committee. Please take a moment to write. If you do not receive our blasts, write to wssmhoa@gmail.com and request to be placed on the email blast mailing list. You will then get all our action alerts and timely updates of neighborhood issues.
Go on record and write to PLUM: Chairperson Reyes, and Councilmembers Huizar and Krikorian c/o sharon.gin@lacity.org. Send a copy to: info@banbillboardblight.org.
Tell them you :
***oppose signs in parks and public facilities
***oppose the current revisions that will allow for signs to be placed without mandatory takedowns. The sign companies should do mandatory takedowns AND contribute to community beautification funds. After all, the signs that they are placing will yield significant income over the years. The City sees no benefits... only blight.
***oppose allowing any off-site signage in Comprehensive Sign Programs.
***oppose signs that cover any windows on buildings.
***oppose legalization of currently illegal billboards that violate provisions of their permits and that are larger and taller than allowed. This provision could affect the status of over 500 billboards.
***oppose allowing zoning administrators authority to grant “adjustments” for
billboards that deviate up to 20% from the height and sign area
specified by their permits. The provision would apply to billboards
erected before the city’s 2002 ban on new off-site signs.
***oppose the approval ("grandfathering") of proposed sign districts that have not had entitlement hearings. Require that any grandfathered sign districts comply with takedown requirements AND community benefits contribution.
***oppose the creation of an
appeals process that could reduce required fines against those not in
compliance with the Ordinance. Section 14.427 would create a mechanism
that could allow outdoor advertisers to avoid the sting of fines used to
encourage compliance with the Ordinance.
The October 5th revision included many dramatic changes,
including:
· a large increase in the number of sign district applications eligible for grandfathering (from the original 2 proposed in March 2009
to 14);
· a new “Community Benefits Program” that would allow
trading off things such as streetscape improvements in lieu of the requirement to
remove old signs on a
greater than one-to-one basis;
· an interior sign exception that does not unequivocally
spell out that city parks are
t o be protected from the impacts of comprehensive sign
programs.
The last of these issues is particularly troubling in light
of Councilmember Jan Perry’s letter to PLUM dated October 18, asking PLUM
to modify the Sign Ordinance to allow commercial advertising in City parks and other facilities.
Councilmember Perry warns that the City will be “missing a critical opportunity
to create possible revenue through signage at city facilities” if the change is
not made.
The PLUM hearing on October
18 was very well attended. Sixty-nine speaker cards were collected, with the
overwhelming majority of speakers opposed to the ordinance. WSSM President Barbara
Broide was among the many speakers opposed, and no community council,
neighborhood council, or group representing homeowners supported the ordinance as written.
Numerous media and sign industry representatives
also expressed their opposition, apparently believing that the current revision
remains too restrictive. Deputy Planning Director Alan Bell was asked to return to PLUM November
1 to discuss a schedule to report back on numerous topics discussed by PLUM, with further hearings expected toward the end of
the year.
For the most up-to-date information, please visit: http://banbillboardblight.org/ .
APRON PARKING
THE LATEST - Oct. 19 update: DOT General Manager Jaime de la Vega issued a letter on October 19th, 2011 to clarify how DOT is responding to the motion passed by Council on Oct. 12.
The letter says:
"Per Council file 11-1676 (Koretz-Rosendahl motion) and advice of the Office of the City Attorney, effective October 12, 2011 LADOT is not issuing parking citations under Los Angeles Municipal Code section 80.53 for paring on a driveway apron. Traffic officers have been instructed as to the change. In addition, any citations issued in error under LAMC section 80.53 on October 12, 2011 or later will be administratively canceled.
LADOT will continue to enforce other sections of the LAMC and California Vehicle Code, including CVC section 22500(e), which prohibits parking in front of the driveway, and CVC section 22500(f), which prohibits parking on the sidewalk."
Oct. 12 update: The Los Angeles City Council approved a motion on October 12, 2011, suspending enforcement of LAMC Section 80.53. While Section 80.53 is
suspended, an owner or lessee may park on the apron as long as no portion of the vehicle touches a sidewalk or projects into the street in violation of California Vehicle Code Sections 22500(e) and (f), respectively. Enforcement of California Vehicle Section 22500, in its
entirety, will remain in full force and effect. In addition, other sections of the Los Angeles Municipal Code regulating "parkways" shall also remain in full force and effect.
July 28 Update: Over 25 WSSM are residents and residents from Westwood Village and Mar Vista attended the July 27th hearing. The Council members said that they would further discuss the issue in LA City Council CLOSED session as the City Attorney's office representative advised them they could not discuss apron parking at the meeting due to the pending litigation. However, the legal action did not stop any of the citizen speakers from describing their many concerns, the negative impact the City's "one size fits all" enforcement has caused including the problems created for those handicapped residents who have relied on apron parking and can now no longer access their vehicles or their homes! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LA CITY COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE CONSIDERED THE ROSENDAHL - KORETZ MOTION TO ALLOW FOR PARKING IN FRONT OF DRIVEWAYS AT THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 27th:
Motion
(Rosendahl – Koretz) instructing DOT to report relative to the steps
necessary to implement the California Vehicle Code exemption to allow
residents to legally park in front of their driveways.
While this motion was written last year and was done before enforcement against parking on the aprons took place, it does not address the Beverly Glen problem. We will ask that the Transportation Committee either amend or introduce a second measure that would allow apron parking where it does not impede handicapped access or violate ADA. ------------------------------------------------------------------- August 19 Update: On Wednesday, August 17th, Councilmember Koretz introduced the following motion to be placed on the City Council's Special Agenda for August 19th (Agenda Item No. 45):
11-1341 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (KORETZ - ROSENDHAL) relative to apron parking in the City of Los Angeles.
Recommendation
for Council action: INSTRUCT and REQUEST, as appropriate, the Los
Angeles Department of Transportation and the City Attorney to report
back on:
a. potential State legislation to correct apron parking problems in the City of Los Angeles.
b.
potential creation of a program to deal with parking in driveways in a
way that is compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
c. a program to allow apron parking that is ADA compliant.
d. meeting with plaintiffs and creating a program in cooperation with the plaintiffs.
The motion passed with consent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- With the motion adopted, the question will now be HOW QUICKLY will DOT and the City Attorney be able to report back to Council with the requested information? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WESTSIDE MOBILITY STUDY CONSULTANTS ANNOUNCE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE MEETINGS. See Traffic/Transportation page for more details.
EXPO PHASE 2 DESIGN OPEN HOUSE: Nov. 14 and 15. See Traffic/Transp. page for more info.
California State Senator Curren D. Price, Jr. representing the 26th Senate District Invites you to a FREE consumer education seminar __________________________________________ Thursday, October 20, 2011, 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Claude Pepper Senior Center, 1762 S. La Cienega Blvd., LA 90035
Panel of Experts to include: Contractors State License Board—Home Improvement & Repairs Public Utilities Commission—Telecommunications Scams Department of Insurance — Insurance Scams Department of Real Estate — Mortgage/Loan Scams Bureau of Automotive Repair — Car Repair Scams Professional Fiduciaries Bureau — Financial Abuse Department of Corporations — Financial Scams Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office— Local Scams
For more information, please contact Rebecca Bernal in Senator Price’s office at (213) 745-6656 or Rebecca.bernal@sen.ca.gov.
PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE CITY'S 2002 SIGNORDINANCE (CF 08-2020) WENT BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL'S PLUM COMMITTEE AUG. 9 and we learned that many changes are being proposed that differ greatly from the recommendations made by the City Planing Commission following three lengthy public hearings they held.
The changes are unacceptable to WSSM and most homeowner associations and community and neighborhood councils. The PLUM Committee's consideration of the changes is being continued to October 18th. We urge our members to review the proposal, to write to the PLUM Committee and to attend the hearing. There are fatal flaws in the ordinance as currently drafted!
The WSSM Board passed the following motion at our September Board meeting:
Westwood South of Santa Monica Blvd. Homeowners Association opposes adoption of the revised citywide
sign ordinance now pending before the City Council Planning and Land Use
Management committee because it would allow a proliferation of commercial
advertising on both private and public property without a significant reduction
in existing billboard and signage blight, and would allow new electronic
signage without addressing energy use, light pollution, traffic safety, and
other issues that could negatively effect communities throughout the city.We also call for a 2-year moratorium on new
digital displays until those issues are thoroughly studied and regulations
developed to address them.
For more information, go to the website of the Coalition to Ban Billboard Blight: www.banbillboardblight.org
* WHY DO WE OPPOSE THE SIGN ORDINANCE AS CURRENTLY REVISED?
It would allow for commercial signage in City parks and playgrounds!
It would allow for individual businesses on any street to have their own digital/electronic signs advertising their business!
It would recognize and grandfather into existence SIGN DISTRICTS that have never had an entitlement hearing!
It could allow sign companies to erect new signs without removing old ones thus resulting in more sign blight and gutting the intent of the 2002 sign ordinance which was to reduce signage!
It could allow for the erection of signs that cover windows!
It would allow for the digital signs outside of sign districts thus endangering drivers and pedestrians, wasting energy, creating light pollution and degrading the quality of life of those who live near them!
and there are more reasons!
City Amends Bus Bench
Contract To Require Compliance With Zoning Regulations
On Friday, August 19, 2011, the Los Angeles
City Council voted to approve a Bus Bench Program that includes amending
language proposed by Councilmember Bill Rosendahl. This amendment incorporates
zoning restrictions into the proposed bus bench contract.
The Bus Bench Program authorizes the
placement of thousands of new bus benches with commercial advertising
throughout the City. They will replace the tan plastic Norman Co. bus benches
currently in the City.WSSM, with other
concerned community groups, expressed our fears that the proposal might allow bus
bench advertisements in areas where zoning regulations preclude such commercial
advertising.We joined with the
Brentwood Residents Coalition who submitted model language to the City that
would preclude the installation of commercial ads on benches in areas that
prohibit or restrict such advertising.
We appreciate the leadership of CD 11 Councilmember
Bill Rosendahl, who made the motion to amend “the proposed contract to require
that new bus benches with advertising be installed in a manner that is
consistent with all local zoning codes, including restrictions on off-site
advertising set forth in the General Plan, Community Plans, Specific Plans as
enacted by ordinance, the California Coastal Act, and all other applicable
law.”
The City Council passed the Bus Bench
Ordinance with the Rosendahl Amendment by a vote of 11-1.
Attending the hearing or submitting comments
were representatives from:The Coalition
to Ban Billboard Blight, the Coastal Law Enforcement Action Network (CLEAN),
the Westwood, Brentwood and Pacific Palisades Community Councils, the Studio
City Neighborhood Council, the Westwood Village Business Association, the Bel
Air Skycrest Property Owners’ Association, the Brentwood Homeowners
Association, the Westwood Homeowners Association, the North Westwood Village
Residents Association, the Tract 7260 Association, and the Pacific Palisades
Residents Association.
The Rosendahl Motion amending the bus bench
contract represents an important first step in controlling the proliferation of
bus bench advertising in scenic and historic areas. But the Bus Bench Program
is far from the only advertising-related ordinance on the City’s agenda. The
proposed City-Wide Sign Ordinance and the Sign Banner Program threaten to bring
additional commercial blight into scenic and historic areas, despite zoning
prohibitions on such signage. These proposals, supported by well-funded and
influential commercial interests, will again challenge the community’s resolve,
resources and abilities.
Your Participation Is
Needed
On Tuesday,
October 18, 2011, at
2 PM, the City Council’s Planning and Land Use Management
(PLUM) Committee will consider the proposed City-Wide Sign Ordinance. This is
the most significant and potentially destructive “billboard” ordinance that the
City has considered in many years. The proposed Ordinance, as currently
drafted, has serious flaws that threaten a dramatic spread of commercial blight
throughout the City. The community must join together in proposing critical
changes to this Ordinance. Watch this website and our WSSM email blasts for
additional information and for updates as the October 18th hearing date
approaches.
THIEVES TARGET GARDENER TRUCKS IN WLA! Read all about it on our CRIME tab and warn your gardener.
August Robberies at West LA stores including Bob's Market and Trader Joe's on National. Read all about it on our CRIME tab.
WSSM SUPPORTS THE PLACEMENT
OF THE FUTURE
CENTURY CITY SUBWAY STOP
ON CONSTELLATION BLVD.
SIGN THE PETITION TO SUPPORT THE CONSTELLATION STATION:
A joint meeting of the City Council Public Works and PLUM (Planning and Land Use Management) Committees will be held on Tuesday, 7/26 at 3 pm in City Hall Room 350 to consider the recent City Attorney's Office report on cell installation regulation. WSSM supports new city policy to allow for additional review and evaluation of locations for cell tower installations.
It is important that all those concerned about CELL INSTALLATIONS communicate with the two committees to support the findings of the City Attorney's report and to adopt new regulations that govern placement on public and private property.
GUEST PARKING PERMITS NOW AVAILABLE BY EMAIL!
Read about it on our Transportation / Traffic page.
THANKS TO ALL THAT STAYED
OFF THE ROADS DURING THE
405 WEEKEND CLOSURE!
------
LA City Sign Ordinance revisions returning to PLUM Committee:
It's
been a long-time coming, but the staff report and recommendations to
revise the current sign ordinance will soon be coming before the PLUM
Committee. Watch for updates and opportunities to comment.
There are a number of major planning initiatives underway that will help to shape how our community and our city will look in the future. Citizen input is important in the review of these initiatives. WSSM plays a role in commenting on these plans whenever possible. We invite you to attend city briefing meetings and learn more. You may wish to comment as an individual (in writing and/or at upcoming public hearings) andor you are welcome to help our HOA to formulate our comments and responses to the city. As you will note below, there are quite a number of plans moving forward, some prompted by a desire of the city to streamline its processes due to staff changes, some as a result of policy changes. When adopted, these will impact the quality of life in the community.
1) LA CITY BIKE PLAN. The 2010 Bicycle Plan serves as the City’s blueprint for meeting the needs of all bicyclists and is intended to increase, improve and enhance bicycling in the City as a safe, healthy, and enjoyable means of transportation and recreation. It designates over 1,600 miles of bikeways and creates a blueprint for the development of the Citywide and Neighborhood Bikeways Networks. For more info, visit: http://www.labikeplan.org/public_involvement/
WSSM would like to form a bicycle task force to review recommendations for our area in particular. Email us if you would like to get involved in this.
2) PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS: The Department of City Planning will be having meetings on the proposed code amendments expected to go before the City Planning Commission on January 10th. Many of the proposed changes are to reduce duplication and will update and clarify the code. However, we have submitted comments and advocate for changes in the language being considered so that there can be no possible weakening or dilution of provisions of or protections provided in Community and Specific Plans. MEetings with Planning Dept. staff and community members have been held since the initial CPC hearing on the proposed changes and revisions to the proposal are being made. We will review the extent of adopted revisions and determine our HOA's standing on the document as it goes to Council for consideration following the CPC's consideration.
For copies of the staff reports including the proposed ordinances, go to: www.planning.lacity.org.
Citywide Draft Design Guidelines: You may review the draft guidelines for multi-family, commercial and industrial properties and submit your written comments on a survey posted online. Follow the links from the City Planning website: http://cityplanning.lacity.org/
Community Care Facilities: The City Council has approved new guidelines to help regulate the placement of Community Care Facilities. (These are sometimes referred to as "sober living homes." )
Consideration of the new ordinance took place before the City Council on June 1st. They voted to adopt and send the measure to the City Attorney for fine tuning and to work out any conflicts with the Housing Dept. to make certain that the ordinance will not jeaopardize the receipt of federal housing funds. It will return to the City Council for a second vote. WSSM supports these efforts and spoke in favor of the proposed ordinance at the CPC's November and February public hearings on the matter. We have joined with other HOA's in suggesting some additions to the proposed ordinance. Our letter to the City Planning Dept. follows.
For more information on the issue, visit the website for the LA Coalition for Neighborhoods who is leading the community effort: www.LACoalition4Neighborhoods.org
Los Angeles, CA 90012VIA EMAIL:James.k.williams@lacity.org
RE: Community Care Facilities Ordinance - CASE NO CPC-2009-800-CA
CEQA ENV-2009-801-ND / COUNCIL FILE 07-3427
Dear President Roschen and Commission Members:
Our organization, Westwood South of Santa Monica Homeowners Association, has reviewed the City Planning Department’s proposed Community Care Facilities Ordinance. At our Board of Director’s meeting on October 5, 2010, our Board voted to support the proposed ordinance with a request that the following six additions as recommended by the Pacific Palisades Community Council be considered by the City and incorporated into the final ordinance:
(a)Clarification that there can be absolutely no unlicensed community care facilities or “sober living” homes operating in low-zoned residential neighborhoods. Part 1 of the proposed Ordinance shall be amended to clearly state that there will be no (a) unlicensed facilities serving six or fewer residents and (b) unlicensed community care facilities serving seven or more residents eligible for the “public benefits” test. This modification will bring the proposed ordinance into conformance with state law that requires any and all residential facilities to have a valid license to operate.Further, it is only through the State of California’s Department of Social Services licensing procedures that (among other things) the number of operators, quality of operators, approved fire clearances, local building use permits, on-site inspections and reviews, and health safety standards can be assured.
(b)Community care facilities must be located 300 feet apart.Part 1 of the proposed Ordinance shall be amended to include a limit on over-concentration which states that all community care facilities must be located more than 300 feet from each other.Further, limits are necessary to address the City’s own findings that the over-concentration of licensed and unlicensed facilities create problems with parking, noise and incompatibility with the character and quality of residential neighborhoods.
(c)Community care facilities must be 2,000 feet from schools, churches, temples and other places of religious worship.This amendment will bring the proposed Ordinance into conformance with findings by the City of Los Angeles at PLUM hearings and other venues.
(d)Public hearings shall be required before City may make a determination relative to the “Public Benefits” test.The Ordinance shall be amended to require a public hearing before the City may make a determination relative to the “Public Benefit” test and performance standards for licensed facilities of seven or more residents.As written, the proposed Ordinance utilizes a “ministerial process” that does not require a public hearing or letter of determination.We believe the fundamental principles of fairness and due process require that the City provide impacted communities the opportunity to be heard when a licensed community care facility with seven or more residents is seeking to locate in the immediate area.Further, we believe that any investigation or evaluation of Public Benefit by the City would be inadequate without public notice and comment.
(e)There shall be no “grandfathering” in of existing community care facilities that are currently in existence but operating unlicensed or illegally licensed. It must be made clear that any existing (a) unlicensed or (b) illegally licensed community care facilities would have to comply with the new ordinance to be allowed.This clarification is required to ensure that all facilities are brought into compliance with the existing zoning code provisions that protect the character of established residential neighborhoods.
(f)Correctional or Penal Institutions, including group homes, are entirely prohibited from locating in residential zones – meaning that there is no chance for these operators to use the CUP process.The proposed Ordinance shall be amended to prohibit Correctional or Penal Institutions in R1, RD1.5, R2 and RD zoned areas.It is wholly inconsistent with the nature of low zoned residential neighborhoods to allow prisons, jails, halfway houses and group parolee homes to operate within them under a conditional use permit or otherwise.
We look to the City and Planning Commission to promulgate regulations that will halt the operation of any group living situations that essentially convert single family homes and duplexes into boarding house living situations.Our neighborhoods are unable to absorb the negative impacts of such uses. Along with the adoption of a strong ordinance must come the provision of enforcement personnel to implement regulations as adopted.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Barbara Broide, President
CC: Councilman Paul Koretz, CD 5
Alan Bell, Planning Dept.
Thomas Rothmann, Planning Dept.
Chris Koontz, CD 5 Planning Deputy
Jay Greenstein, CD 5 Chief Deputy
Local WSSM area State Senator, Jenny Oropeza dies at 53.
Newly elected representative replacing Senator Oropeza is former Assemblymember Ted Liu: 28th District Results
Votes
Percent
TED W LIEU (D)
BOB VALENTINE (R)
MARTHA F GIBSON (R)
MARK LIPMAN (NP)
KEVIN T MCGURK (D)
JAMES P THOMPSON (R)
JEFFREY E FORTINI (R)
MICHAEL CHAMNESS (NP)
Westwood South of